Portability

C++ Boost


Overview
Key
Summary
Mozilla
Netscape
Internet Explorer
Opera
Konqueror
Java Browsers
Command-Line Browsers
Notes

Overview

The tree_control has been tested on a large number of browsers on Linux and Windows, with results displayed in the table below. To summarize, the control displays optimally in browsers used by over 95% of the public and displays adequately in most others, including several command-line browsers and such relics as Netscape 3.01 and Internet Explorer 3.02.[1]

For examples of how tree_control displays on various platforms, see Screenshoots.

Key

Usable - Indicates that the control displays acceptably and allows navigation to all the control's associated urls.
Dynamic - Indicates that the control's nodes can be expanded and collapsed.
Positionable - Indicates that the control can be positioned anywhere within an HTML document. On browsers where the control is not positionable, the control and its caption consume an entire HTML frame.
Synchronizable - Indicates that tree_control.sync() works.
Correctly Formatted - Indicates that tree nodes are displayed with correct numbering and with suitable indentation and are generally acceptable aesthetically.

Summary

Browser Platform Usable Positionable Dynamic Synchronizable Correctly Formatted
Mozilla
Mozilla 1.7 Windows 2000 yes yes yes yes yes[a]
Mozilla 1.5 Windows 2000 yes yes yes yes yes[a]
Mozilla 1.2.1 Linux 2.4.20 yes yes yes yes yes[a]
Mozilla 0.7 Linux 2.4.2 yes yes yes yes yes[a]
Netscape
Netscape 7.0 Windows 2000 yes yes yes yes yes[a]
Netscape 6.2 Windows 2000 yes yes yes yes yes[a]
Netscape 6.1 Windows 2000 yes yes yes yes yes[a]
Netscape 4.8 Windows 2000 yes no[b] no[c] no[c] yes
Netscape 4.76 Linux 2.4.2 yes no[b] no[c] no[c] yes
Netscape 4.08 Windows 95 yes no[b] no[c] no[c] yes
Netscape 4.04 Windows 95 yes no[b] no[c] no[c] yes
Netscape 3.01 Windows 95 yes no no no no[d]
Internet Explorer
Internet Explorer 6.0Windows 2000yesyesyesyesyes
Internet Explorer 5.0Windows 95yesyesyesyesyes
Internet Explorer 4.0[e] - - - - - -
Internet Explorer 3.02Windows 95yesnononoyes
Opera
Opera 7.53 Linux 2.4.20 yes yes yes yes[f] yes
Opera 7.11 Windows 2000yes yes yes yes[f] yes
Opera 6.01Windows 2000yesnononoyes
Opera 5.02 Windows 2000 yes no no no no[d]
Opera 4.02Windows 2000yesnononoyes
Opera 3.0 Windows 2000 no no no no no
Konqueror
Konqueror 3.1Linux 2.4.20yesyesyesyesyes
Konqueror 2.1.1Linux 2.4.2yesnononoyes
Java Browsers
ICEBrowser 6.0.1 (Eval) Windows 2000 yes yes yes no[g] yes
NetClue 4.1 Pro (Eval)Windows 2000yesyesnonoyes
HotJava 3.0 Windows 2000 no no no no no
Command-Line Browsers
Lynx 2.8.3 Windows 2000 yes yes no no no[d]
Links 2.1[h] Linux 2.4.20 no no no no no
Links 2.1 (No JavaScript) Linux 2.4.20 yes yes no no no[d]
Links 0.98 Windows 2000 yes yes no no no[d]

Notes

[a]Occasionally, after a tree_node hyperlink or icon is clicked a flashing cursor appears in the the frame containing the tree_control.

[b]tree_control could be made partially positionable on Netscape 4.x, but not without an unacceptable increase in code size.

[c]tree_control could be made dynamic and synchronizable on Netscape 4.x, but not without an unacceptable increase in code size.

[d]Child tree_nodes are not displayed indented.

[e]Internet Explorer 4.0 should be fully supported, but no data is available since I no longer have a Windows installation using it.

[f]Opera occasionally loses information about the position within a document which is currently being displayed — the information supplied by the 'fragment identifier' portion of a url. As a result, synchronization sometimes results in a url pointing the top of an HTML document rather than to an internal position. Furthermore, Opera sometimes displays the url of an embedded document in the address bar rather than the url of the top-level frameset document. As a result, the url displayed after synchornization is sometimes a link to the document being displayed in the content frame rather than to the top-level frameset document.

[g]The evaluation version of ICEBrowser does not permit loading a url with a query component. If someone has access to a non-evaluation version, I would like to know if this feature works.

[h]Links 2.1's support of JavaScript appears to be extremely limited. I will attempt to add support for Links 2.1, but I am not optimistic.


[1]See, e.g., Browser Statistics.


Revised 22 July, 2004

© Copyright Jonathan D. Turkanis, 2004

Use, modification, and distribution are subject to the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)